3697

Assessment Task Description Assessment Part 1: Case Study Analysis (Report) Weighting: 25% Date due: Week 10 Word limit: 2000 words Purpose: to assess the following Learning Outcomes: a. Explain the difference between domestic and international HRM b. Examine issues and methods faced by managers in staffing, recruiting and selecting the candidates on both levels and challenges faced due to cultural differences c. Methods and challenges of training and development of employees. Students will also be assessed on their ability to work in a team. Your task: Students must identify the IHRM issues covered by the assigned case study, research management theories (especially those contained in the textbook), expert opinions and current management practice regarding the identified issues, and prepare for the presentation. Students must ensure that they apply the relevant management theories covered in this unit when analyzing and recommending actions in their report. Report structure: • • Title page: name of the case, members of the group, date of submission • • Executive Summary: key findings of the group • • Table of Contents: with section numbers and headings • • Introduction: Summarize the case and point out the important case facts • • Key Management Challenge: identify the symptoms and problems • • Case Analysis: identify and apply relevant management theories and address root causes of identified issues • • Recommendations • • Full ‘in-text’ referencing: citing at least four academic sources • • Reference list: using the A.P.A. referencing style Do not focus on a problem that has already been solved also do not focus on many problems at the same time. Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines MGT307 – International Human Resources Management School Business Course Name Bachelor of Business Unit Code MGT307 Unit Title International Human Resources Management Trimester Trimester 1, 2019 Assessment Author Ms. Tanmaya Assessment Type Group Assessment Title Report Weight 25% Total Marks 25 Section to be included in the report Detailed Description of the Criteria Marks Criteria 1 Executive Summary 10 Criteria 2 Introduction: A brief outline of the background to the organization, its parent country and host country 10 Criteria 3 Provide discussions on the differences between how the HRM works in the Parent country and how the same organization works in the host country. 35 Criteria 4 Provide recommendations for the future directions/opportunities/options for the other companies (Whether the company succeeded or failed) Conclusion 20 Criteria 5 Provide at least 10 academic sources of information, and five non-peer review articles Your case study analysis must be fully referenced using the APA style of referencing. 15 Criteria 6 Meetings and journal documentations and contribution provided in appendix OR Matrix Schedule of Group Members work at meetings and documented discussions of cooperation. 10 Total 100 Marking Rubric Criteria/ Grades High Distinction (HD) [Excellent] = or >80% Distinction (D) [Very Good] 70%-79% Credits (C) [Good] 60%-69% Pass (P) [Satisfactory] 50%-59% Fail (N) [Unsatisfactory] <50% Criteria 1 Concise and specific to the project Topics are relevant and soundly analyzed. Generally relevant and analyzed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Criteria 2 Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Criteria 3 All elements are present and very well integrated. Components present with good cohesive Components present and mostly well integrated Most components present Proposal lacks structure. Criteria 4 Logic is clear and easy to follow with Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed strong arguments Criteria 5 Clear styles with excellent source of references. Clear referencing style Generally good referencing style Sometimes clear referencing style Lacks consistency with many errors Comments:

Attachments:

1559612481140….pdf

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now