Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics

Discussion

Purpose

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

Preparing the Discussion

· Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

· Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

· Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

· Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

· Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

· Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

· Best Practices include:

· Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

· Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

· Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics is an important part of healthcare. Nurses and healthcare workers need to understand and be able to communicate clearly.

Please select one of the following options and discuss your understanding of the role in healthcare and its potential impact on your practice.

· Usability

· Integration

· Interface

· Interoperability

· Meaningful Use (Meaningful Use terminology has largely been replaced by the phrase ‘Promoting Interoperability’ or ‘PI’)

· Reimbursement from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment

· NANDA

· NIC/NOC

EBOOK to use for one citation:

https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9781323903148/epubcfi/6/492%5B%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3DP7001015544000000000000000002CB2%5D!/4/2%5BP7001015544000000000000000002CB2%5D/2/2%5BP7001015544000000000000000002CB3%5D/7:6%5B%20In%2Cter%5D

email: kristchelis@gmail.com

Pwd: Leroyismyhero1#

let me know if you cannot have access to the ebook

Prof needs one citation from the ebook and one external citation

Writing an admission essay, often required for college or graduate school applications, is a chance to present yourself beyond the grades and scores. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you create a compelling admission essay:

1. Understand the Prompt:
   • Read the question or topic provided carefully.
   • Know what the institution values and what they’re looking for in their students.
2. Brainstorm:
   • Reflect on personal experiences, challenges, achievements, and events that shaped your personality or aspirations.
   • Identify your strengths, motivations, and what sets you apart.
3. Choose a Theme or Story:
   • Pick an experience or event that demonstrates personal growth, determination, leadership, or passion.
   • Ensure the story aligns with the prompt and showcases qualities the institution values.
4. Draft an Outline:
   • Introduction: Capture the reader’s attention. State the theme or story you’ll be sharing.
   • Body: Elaborate on the story. What happened? Why was it significant? How did it shape you?
   • Conclusion: Reflect on the experience and how it prepares you for the future or the program you’re applying to.
5. Write with Authenticity:
   • Be genuine. Admission officers read thousands of essays and can spot when someone isn’t being truthful.
   • Write in your own voice. Avoid overly formal language if it doesn’t sound like you.
6. Show, Don’t Tell:
   • Use descriptive language and anecdotes. Instead of saying “I’m passionate about biology,” describe an experience that demonstrates that passion.
7. Stay Focused:
   • Stick to the main topic or story. Avoid going on tangents or including unrelated achievements.
8. Limit Use of Clichés:
   • Phrases like “dream come true” or “once in a lifetime opportunity” are often overused.
9. Revise and Refine:
   • First drafts are rarely perfect. Revisit your essay multiple times.
   • Tighten up your language. Remove redundancy.
10. Proofread:

• Check for grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
• Ensure your essay follows any specified formatting or length guidelines.

11. Get Feedback:

• Ask teachers, mentors, or friends to read your essay.
• Consider their feedback but remember the final product should reflect you, not them.

12. Conclude Strongly:

• End by emphasizing why you’re a good fit for the institution or program and vice versa.

13. Submission:

• If submitting online, ensure your essay’s format remains consistent after uploading.
• Follow all guidelines, especially regarding word or page count.

Remember, your essay is a chance to give the admission committee insight into who you are beyond numbers and accolades. It’s about your journey, growth, and aspirations. So, be honest, be yourself, and take the time to carefully craft your story.

Answers doc

1. Let f(x) =4x^3+x^4

   a.) find all x intercepts of f

4x^3+x^4=0

X^3(4+x) =0

X^3=0………………..i

4+x=0………………..ii

X^3=0

X=cube root of 0

X=0

4+x=0

X=-4

X intercepts=0,-4

X intercepts= (0, 0) (-4, 0)

b.)Find all intervals on which f is increasing and decreasing and find all points (x, y) at which relative extreme occur

4x^3+x^4=f(x)

Differentiate the function

12x^2+4x^3=0

4x^2(3+x) =0

(4x^2(3+x))/4=0/4

X^2(3+x) =0

3x^2+x^3=0

X^2(3+x) =0

X^2=0…………………i

3+x=0…………………..ii

X=0

X=-3

X= (0,-3)

Split (-∞, ∞) into separate intervals around the x values that make the derivative 0 or undefined.

Replace x with -1 in the expression

4(-1) ^3+ (-1) ^4=f (-1)

4*-1+1=f (-1)

-4-1=f (-1)

-5=f (-1)

   =-5

When x=-1 the derivative is -5.this is a decreasing function

Ii.)Replace x with 4 in the expression

4(4) ^3+ (4) ^4=f (4)

256+256=f (4)

512=f (4)

=512

When x is 4 the derivative is 512.this is an increasing function

Increasing on: (∞, 0)

Decreasing on: (3, ∞)

c.)All points concave up, down and all points at inflection.

Concave up  

F(x)>0

(4,512)

(2.8, 150.76)

Concave downward

F(x) <0

(-1,-5)

(-3,-189)

Inflection      f(x) =0

(0, 0)

d.) graph

2. Find all intervals on which f(x) =(x^2-x+16)/x-1 is increasing and decreasing and find all values of x at which relative extrema occur.

F(x) =(x^2-x+16)/x-1

(X-1)(X^2-x+16)

X^3-x^2+16x-x^2-x-16

X^3-2x^2+15x

Dy/dx=3x^2-4x+15

X=-b±sqrtb^2-4ac/2a

X=0,-1.33

FX>0= (1,-4)

FX<0= (-1,-34)

FX=0…… (0,-16)

3.) F(x) =x^4-12x^3+48x^2+2

Conc. up on= (2,114)

Conc.down= (-1,112)

Point of inf at x=0

4.) Find all vertical and horizontal asymptotes of g(x) = (x^2-4)/2x^3-x-10

    X²-4

    2x³-x-10

Vertical asymptotes                                       horizontal asymptotes

2x^3-x-10=0                                                      y=0 since the degree at the top is less than at the bottom

(2x+5)(X-2)=0                                                    x^2 is less than x^3

X=-5/2

X=2

5.) Find all absolute extrema of f(x) =100+9x+3x^2-x^3 on the interval (0, 4)

3x^2-x^3+9x+100=f(x)

3x^2-x^3+9x+100=0

Dy/dx=6x-3x^2+9

3(2x-x^2+3)

(X+3)(X-1)

X=-3

X=1

6.

7. Find the differential dy

a.) Y=ln(x^2+4)

Dy/dx=x^2/x+4

b.) y=x^2cos (5x)

y=x^2 –sin (5x)*5

Dy/dx=2-5 sin (5x)

 =-3 sin (5x)

8.

V=4pie r^2

4*3.14*2^2

50.24cm ^3

803 tins

9. X^3-5x^2-8x+3

Dy/dx=3x^2-10x-8

First derivative…………………

(-b±sqrt b^2-4ac)/2a

X= (-1, 2.33)

Second derivative………………..

F(x)>0= (-1, 10), (-5, 45)

F(x) <0= (4,-45), (2.33,-32)

F(x) =0

10.)

$20*x+3x^3=21600

3x^3+2x-21600=0

Dy/dx=9x^2+2=0

X^2=-2/9

X=0.22

3(0.22^3)+2(0.22)

0.007+0.44

0.447

21600/0.447

$48322

Summary

The class began with the lecturer showing us the I-589 form, which is the application for asylum and withholding of removal. The asylum seeker must fill in details of how he entered the United States. Firstly, he must state whether he was allowed to be in the US awaiting the consideration of his asylum status or whether he or she entered without inspection. The applicant is also required to fill in information about his family, spouse, and children since in a case where he gets asylum his family can join him. Notably, when checking the boxes on why one is seeking asylum it is important to check all the applicable boxes. The reason why one should be careful while checking the boxes in the application form is that should one forget to check a certain box it becomes difficult to argue it before the immigration officials. Further, omitting information and filling it in later injures the credibility of the applicant. 

The burden of proof while seeking asylum is on the applicant. The applicant has to show why their government is unable to protect them regarding what happens to them in the past. However, it is always very difficult for the applicant to prove that he was going to get hurt in his country. No country can sign an affidavit stating that it wanted to hurt its citizen. Therefore, it always the word of the asylum seeker against that of the prosecutor. One of the ways to prove the likelihood of future persecution is to bring evidence of past persecution. Therefore, the burden shifts on the government to prove that the circumstances leading to the persecution have changed. Sometimes regardless of strong evidence showing the possibility of persecution should the applicant get removed from the US the judges may deny the application. 

For instance, in the lecturer’s instruction notes hypothetical scenario B painted some situations where the applicant is likely to face persecution. The lecturer cautioned that no matter how convincing the facts are there is no guarantee they will secure asylum. Importantly, some situations do not establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The situations include; personal disputes, blood feuds, financial disagreements, criminal sanctions, and victims of crimes. We then went to look into situations that may lead to granting of asylum as follows;

• Political Opinion

Across the world the are people getting persecuted for holding a specific political opinion. However, other people get persecuted for not holding a clear political opinion. For instance, in civil war some people may not support the government nor do they support the rebel forces. The Matter of Acosta is a clear illustration of the position above. Acosta was a national of El Salvador, who never stated openly whether he supported the government or the guerillas. Acosta belonged to a taxi company that hated to take a position since they could have compromised their business. Unfortunately, Acosta and his associates got persecuted by unknown people for the failure to declare their allegiance. Notably, to show establish persecution based on political opinion one must show that he holds a particular opinion. Secondly, the prosecutor must be convinced that the person holds a political opinion. And lastly that the person faces persecution because of his political opinion. 

Ways to prove Persecutors Motivation

Persecutors’ motivation can get proved through direct or in alternative circumstantial evidence. Sometimes persecution is informed by mixed motives therefore to prove it, circumstantial evidence is essential. For instance, in the Matter of Gafoor v INS. The applicant was a Fiji national and a policeman of Indian descent. In the course of his duties, he arrested a person who was raping a thirteen-year-old girl. On taking the person to the station he got informed that he was a high-ranking official in the Fiji government. Shortly after the man that Gafoor had arrested was released from custody. Consequently, Gafoor became a target of persecution and racist attacks. Notably, Fiji Indians are subject to persecution in Fiji. Therefore, Gafoor came to seek asylum in the US to escape persecution. The circumstantial evidence was that the arrest he had made led to the racist attacks that almost led to his death. Ultimately, Gafoor was granted asylum. 

We then looked at the Real ID Act of 2005. The Act departed from the position in Gafoor v INS holding that protectable ground was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant. The leading case in the Real ID Act is the Parussimova v Mukasey. The applicant was a Russian national who lived in Kazakhstan. She was a subject of persecution because of nationality and also because she worked with an American company. Notably, her persecutors assaulted called her dirty pig, and almost raped her. In another incident, they attacked while she was walking with her cousin. She was fortunate enough to escape but they beat her cousin till he went into a coma. However, Parussimova was not granted asylum since the court held that she was not attacked on account of a protected ground.

Lastly, when dealing with asylum cases it is necessary to hold the confidentiality of the applicants. In the Board of Immigration Appeals, the names are abbreviated to disguise the identity of the individuals involved. Notably, some cases are very sensitive, for instance, the one involving apostasy when it comes to the laws of Iran since the individual is likely to get killed should they be found out. Unfortunately, the court of Appeals still uses full names despite efforts to have them use abbreviations